Birth Control Patch lawsuit
Many women in the world get pregnant when they aren't ready for it. There can be many reasons behind not wanting a child. As many times some habits of the pregnant women can cause birth injury to the baby. To avoid such circumstances, they use birth control patches.
Meaning
People also call contraceptive patch the patch. Women use the patch through the skin. On application, it discharges synthetic estrogen and progestin hormones to avoid pregnancy. It causes many fatal side effects, which can lead to birth control patch lawsuits.
Benefits
Since the patch acts in a similar way to contraceptive pills, many of the same advantages apply. For instance, the patch can make a female's menstrual cycle lighter and more consistent. It can also aid in treating acne, the reduction of cramps, and the reduction of PMS symptoms.
Also, the patch reduces the risk of iron deficiency, a pelvic inflammatory disorder, and endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer, ovarian cysts.
The patch is an easy and effective method of contraception. It only requires your attention once a week. When a woman ceases using the patch, she regains her ability to conceive easily.
What is the mechanism of action of the birth control patch?
The Birth control patch prevents sperm from combining with an egg and thus, avoids pregnancy.
The patch includes estrogen and progestin, much like most contraceptive pills. Our body also generates such hormones naturally. Doctors recommend wearing the patch on the stomach, buttocks, upper arms, or back, and the skin consumes the hormones.
The patch's hormones prevent ovulation. It stops ovulation. Thus, ovaries don't produce any egg to fertilize with sperm, and conception becomes impossible.
The hormones in the patch make the mucus on the cervix thick. It acts like a sticky safety shield preventing sperm from swimming to an egg. Click here to know more about birth injury.
Side effects of Birth Control patch
Compared to contraceptive pills, fewer than one in 100 women will become pregnant within the first year of regular patch application.
Contraception patch covers sexually transmitted diseases (STIs).
The following are possible contraception patch side effects:
The elevated risk involves Blood clotting issues, heart failure, liver cancer, strokes, hypertension, and gallbladder disease.
Breakout of the skin
Tenderness or pain in the breasts
Spotting or bleeding of the skin
Nausea or Vomiting
Pains and aches
Swings of mood
Pressure in the abdomen
Menstrual cramps
Gaining weight
Diarrhea
Acne is a skin condition that occurs when the skin
Feeling dizzy
Tiredness
Discharge and Infections in the vaginal region
Spasms of the muscles
Retention of fluid
Studies show that the contraception patch can raise estrogen content in the body compared to oral combination contraceptive pills. When you utilize the patch instead of combined contraceptive pills, you might have a marginally higher chance of estrogen-related adverse effects like blood clots. These side effects of birth control patches cause many birth control patch lawsuits.
Birth Control Patch lawsuits
A subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson owns a brand of birth control patches named Ortho Evra. Thousands of users filed birth control patch lawsuits against Ortho Evra, claiming that J&J failed to properly alert customers about the increased risk of such life-threatening adverse effects in the original labeling and advertising.
As per the litigation, Ortho Evra transmits directly through the skin. It releases hormones, especially estrogen, at a much larger level. According to the company's website, Ortho Evra contains 60% more estrogen than standard oral contraceptives.
Read more about the birth control patch lawsuits by clicking here.
Summary
A birth control patch prevents sperm from combining with an egg and thus, avoids pregnancy. It acts like a sticky safety shield preventing sperm from swimming to an egg. Birth control patches contain 60% more estrogen than standard oral contraceptives. Thousands of users filed birth control patch lawsuits against Ortho Evra, claiming that J&J failed to alert customers about the increased risk of such life-threatening adverse effects.
